EBIOCARB: sustainable hybrid fuels

Khasha­yar Saleh and Mikel Leturia, respec­tive­ly tenured Pro­fes­sor and a Senior Lec­tur­er, are based in the Depart­ment of Process Engi­neer­ing and the UTC-TIMR lab­o­ra­to­ry. The for­mer is also Direc­tor of the research unit. As spe­cial­ists in pow­ders, they are joint­ly lead­ing the UTC’s par­tic­i­pa­tion in the EBIOCARB PEPR, finan­cial­ly sup­port­ed by ‘France 2030’ to the tune of 15 mil­lion euros.

Coor­di­nat­ed by the CEA via the APED¹, EBIOCARB is sched­uled to run for near­ly six years and involves a con­sor­tium of 11 part­ners, includ­ing the Insti­tut Supérieur de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace [aero­nau­tics and space], Uni­ver­sité Paris Cité, the CEA, INRAE and IFPEN, the lat­ter being respon­si­ble for over­all sci­en­tif­ic lead­er­ship. The aim of the PEPR ‘Sus­tain­able Hybrid Fuels: E‑Biofuels’ is to replace fos­sil fuels with bio-based and renew­able alternatives.

What is the UTC’s role in this con­sor­tium? “Build­ing on the Pho­bars project fund­ed by the ANR |French nation­al research fund­ing agency], we are focus­ing on the pneu­mat­ic con­vey­ing of pow­ders derived from uncon­ven­tion­al solids such as bio­mass, intend­ed to feed the reac­tors. One of the chal­lenges we face is ensur­ing a con­sis­tent feed to the reac­tors,” explains Khasha­yar Saleh.

This chal­lenge stems from the very nature of bio­mass. “Indeed, the par­ti­cles are often fibrous, elon­gat­ed and tend to become entan­gled. These prop­er­ties mean that con­ven­tion­al design rules, estab­lished for more reg­u­lar par­ti­cles, need to be adapt­ed to these bio­mass­es. Among oth­er things, this involves under­stand­ing these phe­nom­e­na in order to opti­mise flow pat­terns. To achieve this, we com­bine a pilot-scale exper­i­men­tal approach with a numer­i­cal sim­u­la­tion approach,” explains Mikel Leturia.

What are some of the prac­ti­cal appli­ca­tions of EBIOCARB? “Essen­tial­ly, it involves devel­op­ing e‑biofuels for the avi­a­tion and mar­itime sec­tors – sec­tors where elec­tri­fi­ca­tion is dif­fi­cult. In the approach under inves­ti­ga­tion, the gasi­fi­ca­tion of bio­mass (agri­cul­tur­al and forestry residues) pro­duces a syn­the­sis gas con­tain­ing, in par­tic­u­lar, car­bon monox­ide and hydro­gen, which can then be con­vert­ed into fuels. Why e‑biofuels? The ‘E’ refers to low-car­bon elec­tric­i­ty, which enables addi­tion­al hydro­gen to be pro­duced through the elec­trol­y­sis of water. This addi­tion­al sup­ply of hydro­gen makes it pos­si­ble to con­vert a greater pro­por­tion of the car­bon from the bio­mass into fuel. It is this com­bi­na­tion of bio­mass and elec­tric­i­ty that gives them the name ‘hybrid fuels’, or ‘e‑biofuels’,” explains Mikel Leturia.

Anoth­er avenue being explored, again in the field of ener­gy, is the co-elec­trol­y­sis of CO₂ and water to pro­duce syn­gas, which will sup­ple­ment the syn­the­sis gas pro­duced from bio­genic resources. “The aim is to reduce green­house gas emis­sions com­pared with fos­sil fuels,” explains Khasha­yar Saleh.

The pro­duc­tion process begins with the prepa­ra­tion of the bio­mass, fol­lowed by its gasi­fi­ca­tion, which results in the pro­duc­tion of syn­the­sis gas. It is after gasi­fi­ca­tion that the process known as Fis­ch­er-Trop­sch comes into play. “This process uses a cat­a­lyst to con­vert the mix­ture of car­bon monox­ide (CO) and hydro­gen (H₂) into hydro­car­bons. The addi­tion of extra hydro­gen – derived from water elec­trol­y­sis, for exam­ple – would increase the yield and over­all effi­cien­cy of the process. We face, how­ev­er, a twofold chal­lenge: the vari­abil­i­ty of inputs depend­ing on their source and the sea­sons, and fluc­tu­a­tions in the avail­abil­i­ty of low-car­bon elec­tric­i­ty, depend­ing on the sources utilised,” says Mikel Leturia.

Com­pared with nat­ur­al gas, syn­gas pro­duc­tion involves com­plex process­es. “How­ev­er, the attrac­tive­ness of syn­gas lies in its ver­sa­til­i­ty, as a wide range of prod­ucts can be man­u­fac­tured from syn­thet­ic gas and its com­po­si­tion varies depend­ing on the intend­ed appli­ca­tion. The pro­gramme focus­es on the entire val­ue chain, from bio­mass – how to trans­port it? how to process it? – right through to the final prod­uct. Name­ly, the type of bio­fu­el required. If, for exam­ple, we wish to pro­duce methanol, we must adjust the pro­por­tions of hydro­gen, car­bon monox­ide and car­bon diox­ide. This rais­es the ques­tion of which bio­mass source to pri­ori­tise for pro­duc­ing syn­gas that enables the opti­mal pro­duc­tion of var­i­ous bio­fu­els. This pro­duc­tion takes place in biore­finer­ies – refiner­ies like any oth­ers, but adapt­ed to work with bio-resources. This presents a num­ber of chal­lenges: cost, safe­ty, impu­ri­ties, vari­abil­i­ty in the resource …”, empha­sis­es Khasha­yar Saleh. Is there evi­dence of the impor­tance of the UTC’s role and its involve­ment in research-based train­ing? The fund­ing, as part of EBIOCARB, of one PhD the­sis out of the 23 includ­ed in the PEPR, in close col­lab­o­ra­tion with two post­doc­tor­al researchers at IFPEN. 

¹ https://www.agence-aped.fr/pepr/pepr-ebiocarb/

MSD

Le magazine

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram