Selection of nucleotide probes, future aptamers

Stéphane Octave, a research engi­neer at UTC’s GEC lab­o­ra­to­ry, is work­ing with Séver­ine Padi­ol­leau on Lyme dis­ease. He explains the process of select­ing oligonu­cleotide probes.

Con­crete­ly? “First, we use sin­gle-strand­ed DNA or RNA that can be struc­tured and thus acquire the abil­i­ty to specif­i­cal­ly recog­nise a mol­e­c­u­lar tar­get. In this case, this oligonu­cleotide sequence becomes an aptamer,” he says.

The tar­get selec­tion process? “It involves pro­duc­ing the pro­tein of inter­est in a bac­teri­um oth­er than the one involved in Lyme dis­ease, puri­fy­ing it and ensur­ing that it is in its nat­ur­al con­for­ma­tion so that selec­tion can begin. We attach this pro­tein to mag­net­ic beads, which we then bring into con­tact with our DNA bank con­tain­ing 1014 dif­fer­ent oligonu­cleotides. Next, we need to iso­late, from among these 1014 DNA strands, those capa­ble of recog­nis­ing the tar­get and which could become aptamer can­di­dates. This is where the exper­tise of the lab­o­ra­to­ry, and in par­tic­u­lar that of Prof. Bérangère Bihan-Avalle, comes into play, enabling this selec­tion process to be car­ried out suc­cess­ful­ly. If I dared to use a metaphor, I would say that this process is based on the prin­ci­ple of musi­cal chairs, but on a mol­e­c­u­lar scale. At each selec­tion round, we will col­lect the can­di­dates that inter­est us. So, if we attach a pro­tein to a bead and bring our DNA bank into con­tact with it, a cer­tain num­ber of these DNA mol­e­cules will inter­act, bind to the pro­tein and be col­lect­ed to make copies for the next round. The rest of the DNA, which is not bound, will be of no inter­est to us. In the next round, the selec­tion con­di­tions are mod­i­fied to make it increas­ing­ly dif­fi­cult to bind to our tar­get. In this case, we refer to selec­tion pres­sure. In this way, we grad­u­al­ly reduce the diver­si­ty and obtain a few mol­e­cules as can­di­dates qual­i­fied for aptamer sta­tus. Final­ly, we syn­the­sise them inde­pen­dent­ly and test them one by one to deter­mine their abil­i­ty to specif­i­cal­ly recog­nise our tar­get. Of course, we keep the best ones based on a per­for­mance thresh­old com­pat­i­ble with the end-use objec­tive,” explains Stéphane Octave.

MSD

Le magazine

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram